ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN THE MUET TEST 2022: IDENTIFYING PATTERNS AND AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT
Keywords:
MUET test, English proficiency assessment, student performanceAbstract
This paper presents an analysis of student’s performance in the Malaysian University
English Test (MUET) conducted in the year 2022. The study employs a quantitative approach,
utilizing descriptive analysis techniques to scrutinize the data obtained from 96 participants. The
method used was percentile analysis, where each piece of data was broken down into
percentages. The primary objective of the analysis is to identify patterns and areas of
improvement within the components of the MUET test: reading, listening, writing and speaking.
The findings of the study reveal a notable trend among the students indicating a lack of proficiency
in the reading and listening components. The subpar performance in these areas subsequently
had an adverse effect on their overall achievement in the writing and speaking components of the
test. This observation suggests a need for targeted interventions and enhanced instructional
strategies to address the identified weaknesses. By examining the patterns of achievement across
the different components of the MUET test, this research paper provides valuable insights for
educators, policymakers and curriculum developers. It highlights the importance of focusing on
the reinforcement of reading and listening skills to enhance students’ overall performance in
English language proficiency assessments and their English language proficiency in general.
References
Abd Samad, A., Syed Abd Rahman, S.Z & Yahya, S.N. (2008). Refining English language tests for University entrance: A Malaysian example. Asian Journal of University Education. Vol 3(1), 57-71.
Begert, L. O. (2015). SILENCE IS GOLDEN: WHAT IS THE SILENT PERIOD IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION? Fabua Lingua. Retrieved June 1, 2023, from https://www.fabulingua.com/blog/what-is-the-silent-period-in-second-language-acquisition
Council of Europe (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment, Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg Cedex: Council of Europe.
Hossain, M. I. (2015). Teaching Productive Skills to the Students: A Secondary Level Scenario [Master of Arts in English, BRAC University]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/74352632.pdf
Krashen, S. (1991). The input hypothesis: An update. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1991: Linguistics and Language Pedagogy: The State of the Art. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis Issues and Implications. Harlow Longman. 80.
Krashen, S. D, (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, Pergamon Press.
Lee, S. H., & Muncie, J. (2006). From Receptive to Productive: Improving ESL Learners’ Use of Vocabulary in a Post reading Composition Task. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 295.
Malaysian Examinations Council. (2019). Malaysian University English Test (MUET): Regulations and test specifications. Selangor: Malaysian Examinations Council.
Ministry of Education. (2015). Executive Summary: Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Higher Education.
Moon, T. S. &Siew, H. O. (2004). A study on the factors that impact on the academic performance of the computer science and the information technology students in University of Malaya. CMU Journal. Vol 3 (2), 169-184.
Richards, J. (2015). Bridging the gap between receptive and productive competence. World of Better Learning. Retrieved June 1, 2023, from https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/2015/08/27/bridging-gap-receptive-productive-competence/
Zulkifli, M. N., Nur Azilah, I., Nuraini, K., Shahrum, A. & Mohd Marzuki, M. (2011). MUET score and loading Hour: An analysis on the relationship towards academic performance Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol18, 103-109.
