Metode Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Audit: Apakah Sudah Relevan ?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37338/jaab.v5i2.244Keywords:
Learning Methods, Competence, Accounting, AuditAbstract
This study aims to determine the relevant learning methods used by tertiary institutions in the course audit course, which will produce graduates who have competencies that are in line with industry needs. This research focuses on identifying the learning methods currently applied by universities through semester plan learning (RPS) at various universities in Indonesia, which are obtained via the internet. As for identifying learning methods that can produce graduates who have competence in accordance with the industry, data is obtained through questionnaires distributed to accounting practitioners. This study applies a quantitative descriptive approach using survey methods. The population in this study were students majoring in accounting in Indonesia and practitioners in the fields of accounting, finance, and auditing. The results show that there is a gap between the learning methods currently applied by universities and those expected by practitioners. Higher education institutions mostly apply group discussions, while the industry applies case-based learning
References
Andriani, W., Rosalina, E., Sriyunianti, F., Afrizon, F., & Aprila, D. (2023). Perancangan Database Akuntansi Menggunakan Microsoft Access Pada Usaha Konveksi Taylor Abadi. Jurnal Sains Dan Informatika, 9(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.22216/jsi.v4i1
Beard, D. F. (1998). The status of internships/cooperative education experiences in accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education, 16(3–4), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0748-5751(98)00021-9
Carrera, B. (2010). Diseño Del Sistema Académico Por Competencias De La Escuela De Turismo Y Hospitalidad De La Pontificia Universidad Católica Del Ecuador. April. https://doi.org/10.4206/gest.tur.2010.n13-05
de la Rosa, D., Giménez, P., & de la Calle, C. (2019). Educación para el desarrollo sostenible: el papel de la universidad en la Agenda 2030. Prisma Social, 25, 179–202.
Dyball, M. C., Reid, A., Ross, P., & Schoch, H. (2010). Compulsory group work – accounting students’ conceptions and suggestions. Asian Review of Accounting Asian Review of Accounting Asian Review of Accounting, 23(3), 92–105.
Efgivia, M. G., Adora Rinanda, R. ., Suriyani, Hidayat, A., Maulana, I., & Budiarjo, A. (2021). Analysis of Constructivism Learning Theory. Proceedings of the 1st UMGESHIC International Seminar on Health, Social Science and Humanities (UMGESHIC-ISHSSH 2020), 585, 208–212. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211020.032
Falcon, M., Marcelo, L., & Gavilanes, E. T. C. (2017). Las Competencias del contador-auditor que labora en el sector público. Augusto Guzzo Rev. Augusto Guzzo Rev. Acadêmica, 1, 9–20.
Gerald, D., & Durana, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence-based Decision-Making Algorithms, Automated Production Systems, and Big Datadriven Innovation in Sustainable Industry 4.0. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 15, 9–18.
Hendra Titisari, K., Wijayanti, A., & Chomsatun, Y. (2013). Model Pembelajaran Akuntansi Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Buletin Studi Ekonomi, 18(2), 126–135.
Irving, J. H. (2011). Integrating research into an undergraduate accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(2), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-10016
James, K. (2008). A Critical Theory and Postmodernist approach to the teaching of accounting theory. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(5), 643–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2006.11.004
Khoerunnisa, P., & Aqwal, S. M. (2020). Analisis Model-model Pembelajaran. Fondatia, 4(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v4i1.441
Lam, J. Y. C., Chan, R. K. H., & Yan, K. Y. K. (2015). A report on the online learning experience of students in accounting course. International Journal of Services and Standards, 10(4), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSS.2015.072453
Luis, J., & R, I. D. L. (2021). Model to Develop Skills in Accounting Students for a 4 . 0 Industry and 2030 Agenda : From an International Perspective. 1–31.
Morales, P. (2009). La evaluación académica: conceptos y planteamientos básicos. Universidad de Deusto, 2, 29–45.
Mosteanu, N. R., & Faccia, A. (2020). Digital systems and new challenges of financial management – fintech, XBRL, blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Quality - Access to Success, 21(174), 159–166.
Peters, E., Kliestik, T., Musa, H., & Durana, P. (2020). Product decision-making information systems, real-time big data analytics, and deep learning-enabled smart process planning in sustainable industry 4.0. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 8(3), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.22381/JSME8320202
Sari, P. A., & Fazda Oktavia, F. Z. (2021). Sumber Belajar Alternatif Mata Kuliah Akuntansi Bagi Mahasiswa Generasi Z. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 19(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v19i1.37083
Suryana, E., Aprina, M. P., & Harto, K. (2022). Teori Konstruktivistik dan Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(7), 2070–2080. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i7.666
Tayeb, T. (2017). Analisis dan Manfaat Model Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 4(02), 48–55.
Weltman, D., & Whiteside, M. (2010). Comparing the effectiveness of traditional and active learning methods in business statistics: Convergence to the mean. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2010.11889480
Wiradarma, A. A. N. B., & Sari Widhiyani, N. L. (2021). Kompetensi dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kesiapan Mahasiswa Jurusan Akuntansi dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(2), 337. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2021.v31.i02.p06
Yusuf Aditya, D. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Resitasi terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 1(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v1i2.1023
